PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYM vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UYM has outperformed ERX with an annualized return of 11.85%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively lower -8.79% annualized return.


UYM

1D
2.40%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
25.08%
6M
32.48%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
11.85%

ERX

1D
2.68%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
66.93%
6M
59.74%
1Y
90.37%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
-8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
25.08%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%54.58%16.56%35.09%-35.68%51.51%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.93%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and ERX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between UYM and ERX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UYM vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UYM
ERX

Basic Materials

87.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

1.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

UYM
87.6%
ERX

-

Consumer Cyclical

UYM
12.4%
ERX

-

Industrials

UYM
1.1%
ERX

-

Communication Services

UYM

-

ERX

-

Consumer Defensive

UYM

-

ERX

-

Energy

UYM

-

ERX
100.0%

Financial Services

UYM

-

ERX

-

Healthcare

UYM

-

ERX

-

Real Estate

UYM

-

ERX

-

Technology

UYM

-

ERX

-

Utilities

UYM

-

ERX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYMERXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.21

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.62

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.89

-2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

10.60

-6.51

UYM vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYMERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.21

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.56

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

-0.13

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.09

+0.17

Drawdowns

UYM vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-99.54%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.85%

-23.34%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.88%

-42.34%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

-46.90%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

-98.59%

+25.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

-91.57%

+82.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.12%

-67.02%

+24.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

8.57%

+0.15%

Volatility

UYM vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) is 12.00%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that UYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYMERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.00%

16.49%

-4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.85%

33.45%

-7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.72%

41.14%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.26%

51.98%

-12.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.77%

69.18%

-26.41%

UYM vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYM vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than ERX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%0.00%0.00%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.21%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYM and ERX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to UYM (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 11.85% vs -8.79% for ERX. On fees, UYM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UYM has been the lower-risk option at 12.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 11.85% return vs -8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.21% for UYM.

UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYM and 1.09% for ERX.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYM and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer