UYLD vs. SPTU
UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. UYLD is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
UYLD vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPTU's 1.48% return.
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.95% | 1.15% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYLD and SPTU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYLD vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
UYLD
SPTU
UYLD vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UYLD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 225.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UYLD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.99 | 11.77 | -5.78 |
Drawdowns
UYLD vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYLD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -0.04% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.00% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
UYLD vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYLD | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 0.32% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 0.32% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 0.32% | +0.68% |
UYLD vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYLD vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYLD and SPTU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for UYLD.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for UYLD and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer