PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYLD vs. KWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYLD vs. KWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than KWT's -0.12% return.


UYLD

1D
0.05%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.39%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
10Y*

KWT

1D
0.30%
1M
0.39%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYLD vs. KWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
2.03%5.36%6.10%6.90%1.09%
KWT
iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF
-0.12%25.38%11.29%-4.71%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between UYLD and KWT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYLD vs. KWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYLD
UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KWT
KWT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYLD vs. KWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UYLDKWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+21.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.49

1.12

+3.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

37.30

0.65

+36.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

226.63

1.53

+225.11

UYLD vs. KWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYLD Sharpe Ratio is 8.03, which is higher than the KWT Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYLD and KWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UYLD vs. KWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum KWT drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and KWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYLDKWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-24.37%

+23.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.14%

-11.54%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.54%

-15.72%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.95%

+4.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-7.30%

+7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

4.93%

-4.91%

Volatility

UYLD vs. KWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.36%, while iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYLDKWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

3.76%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

11.79%

-11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64%

13.85%

-13.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.00%

13.64%

-12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.00%

13.94%

-12.94%

UYLD vs. KWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KWT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYLD vs. KWT - Dividend Comparison

UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than KWT's 5.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
KWT
iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF
5.41%5.40%6.09%2.25%5.87%7.65%0.27%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
5.03%5.07%4.97%5.92%0.75%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYLD and KWT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KWT has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to UYLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs KWT's -24.37%.

On 3-year performance, KWT leads with 10.80% vs 5.92% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, KWT has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KWT.

KWT has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.

UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while KWT is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.74% for KWT.

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYLD and KWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer