UYLD vs. AOHY
UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UYLD returned 5.14% vs 7.05% for AOHY. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AOHY.
Performance
UYLD vs. AOHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than AOHY's 2.21% return.
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOHY
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD vs. AOHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.95% | 5.36% | 5.16% |
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 2.21% | 7.62% | 7.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYLD and AOHY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYLD vs. AOHY — Risk / Return Rank
UYLD
AOHY
UYLD vs. AOHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UYLD | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +18.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.32 | 1.46 | +2.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.76 | 2.99 | +34.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 225.62 | 15.09 | +210.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UYLD | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.96 | 2.23 | +5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.99 | 2.02 | +3.97 |
Drawdowns
UYLD vs. AOHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum AOHY drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and AOHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYLD | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -4.17% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | -2.37% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.35% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.47% | -0.45% |
Volatility
UYLD vs. AOHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.38%, while Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYLD | AOHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.99% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.50% | 2.50% | -2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 3.18% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 3.79% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 3.79% | -2.79% |
UYLD vs. AOHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AOHY's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYLD vs. AOHY - Dividend Comparison
UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than AOHY's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF | 6.51% | 6.53% | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYLD and AOHY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOHY has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs AOHY's -4.17%.
On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 7.05% vs 5.14% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 7.05% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AOHY.
AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.
UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while AOHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.55% for AOHY.
UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.96 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYLD and AOHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer