UXPIX vs. RYCQX
UXPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund) and RYCQX (Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX returned -20.37%/yr vs -12.08%/yr for RYCQX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UXPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for RYCQX.
Performance
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXPIX achieves a -21.75% return, which is significantly lower than RYCQX's -14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX has underperformed RYCQX with an annualized return of -20.37%, while RYCQX has yielded a comparatively higher -12.08% annualized return.
UXPIX
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -23.23%
- 5Y*
- -16.79%
- 10Y*
- -20.37%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.96%
RYCQX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -10.56%
- YTD
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- -24.47%
- 3Y*
- -10.06%
- 5Y*
- -6.22%
- 10Y*
- -12.08%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | -21.75% | -40.68% | -0.70% | -23.81% | 19.33% | -25.44% | -36.55% | -33.25% | 29.63% | -37.30% |
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | -14.69% | -9.40% | -6.15% | -10.73% | 16.50% | -18.59% | -31.59% | -20.84% | 10.41% | -14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXPIX and RYCQX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2006 | 0.74 |
The correlation between UXPIX and RYCQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXPIX vs. RYCQX — Risk / Return Rank
UXPIX
RYCQX
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) and Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXPIX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.83 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.35 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCQX drawdown of -96.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXPIX and RYCQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXPIX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.50% | -96.16% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.06% | -26.78% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.28% | -42.85% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.70% | -42.88% | -32.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.09% | -74.27% | -15.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.50% | -96.04% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.61% | -70.71% | -11.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.06% | 16.46% | +6.60% |
Volatility
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) at 3.79%. This indicates that UXPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXPIX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 3.79% | +6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.16% | 14.07% | +14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.26% | 19.34% | +12.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 23.38% | +10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.00% | 23.82% | +11.18% |
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCQX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Dividend Comparison
UXPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than RYCQX's 9.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | 9.22% | 7.87% | 7.14% | 9.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.86% |
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | 4.22% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXPIX and RYCQX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXPIX has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to RYCQX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXPIX dropped -99.50% vs RYCQX's -96.16%.
UXPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.07 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXPIX and RYCQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer