UXPIX vs. RYCQX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UXPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund) and RYCQX (Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX returned -21.39%/yr vs -13.05%/yr for RYCQX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for RYCQX.

Performance

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) and Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXPIX achieves a -19.40% return, which is significantly lower than RYCQX's -16.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX has underperformed RYCQX with an annualized return of -21.39%, while RYCQX has yielded a comparatively higher -13.05% annualized return.

UXPIX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: -19.40%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: -34.09%
• 3Y*: -24.71%
• 5Y*: -16.60%
• 10Y*: -21.39%

RYCQX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -4.69%
• YTD: -16.80%
• 6M: -14.73%
• 1Y: -27.33%
• 3Y*: -13.46%
• 5Y*: -6.18%
• 10Y*: -13.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund	-19.40%	-40.68%	-0.70%	-23.81%	19.33%	-25.44%	-36.55%	-33.25%	29.63%	-37.30%
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund	-16.80%	-9.40%	-6.15%	-10.73%	16.50%	-18.59%	-31.59%	-20.84%	10.41%	-14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UXPIX and RYCQX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2006	0.74

The correlation between UXPIX and RYCQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UXPIX vs. RYCQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXPIX

UXPIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
UXPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
UXPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
UXPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
UXPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
UXPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

RYCQX

RYCQX Risk / Return Rank: 0
RYCQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RYCQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RYCQX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RYCQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYCQX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) and Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UXPIX	RYCQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.11	-1.44	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	-2.08	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.78	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.03	-1.03	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	-1.84	+0.13

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXPIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is comparable to the RYCQX Sharpe Ratio of -1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXPIX and RYCQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCQX drawdown of -96.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXPIX and RYCQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXPIX	RYCQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.48%	-96.14%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.14%	-27.23%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.24%	-42.51%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.97%	-42.54%	-32.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.30%	-76.08%	-15.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.48%	-96.14%	-3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.52%	-70.58%	-11.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.41%	16.09%	+5.32%

Volatility

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) at 6.40%. This indicates that UXPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXPIX	RYCQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	6.40%	+3.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.94%	14.26%	+12.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.68%	19.68%	+12.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.83%	23.50%	+10.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.47%	23.90%	+11.57%

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCQX's 2.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXPIX vs. RYCQX - Dividend Comparison

UXPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than RYCQX's 9.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund	9.46%	7.87%	7.14%	9.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.86%
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund	4.10%	3.30%	0.00%	3.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXPIX and RYCQX in my portfolio?

UXPIX and RYCQX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UXPIX or RYCQX?

UXPIX has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to RYCQX (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXPIX dropped -99.48% vs RYCQX's -96.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UXPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.11 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.