UXOC vs. JANB
UXOC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXOC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
UXOC vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXOC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.08% return.
UXOC
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXOC vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXOC FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October | 11.39% | 2.96% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXOC and JANB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXOC vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
UXOC
JANB
UXOC vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UXOC | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXOC | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 1.97 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
UXOC vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXOC drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXOC and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXOC | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -6.52% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.22% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -1.14% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility
UXOC vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXOC | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 7.41% | +5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 7.41% | +10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 7.41% | +10.55% |
UXOC vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXOC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXOC vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXOC nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, UXOC and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXOC.
UXOC and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXOC and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for UXOC and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer