UXOC vs. GSG
UXOC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - UXOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. UXOC is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, UXOC returned 26.70% vs 45.17% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. UXOC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
UXOC vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXOC achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 36.99% return.
UXOC
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 36.99%
- 6M
- 33.63%
- 1Y
- 45.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
UXOC vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UXOC FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October | 8.67% | 17.29% | 0.01% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 36.99% | 5.93% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXOC and GSG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024 | -0.04 |
The correlation between UXOC and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXOC vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
UXOC
GSG
UXOC vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UXOC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 4.80 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 12.37 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXOC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.96 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | -0.09 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
UXOC vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXOC drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXOC and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXOC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -89.62% | +69.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -9.46% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -58.64% | +55.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -63.71% | +60.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.66% | -1.41% |
Volatility
UXOC vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) is 4.24%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that UXOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXOC | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 7.03% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 20.66% | -10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 23.15% | -9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 22.63% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 22.04% | -3.97% |
UXOC vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXOC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXOC vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXOC nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UXOC and GSG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to UXOC (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXOC dropped -19.93% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 45.17% vs 26.70% for UXOC. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UXOC has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 45.17% return vs 26.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXOC.
UXOC and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UXOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXOC and 0.75% for GSG.
UXOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXOC and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer