UXJL vs. UXJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

UXJL vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UXJL having a 11.78% return and UXJA slightly lower at 11.66%.

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJL vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	11.66%	9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJL and UXJA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	1.00

Return for Risk

UXJL vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJL vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXJL	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.87	1.04	+0.83

Drawdowns

UXJL vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJL	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-20.01%	+9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.67%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-2.97%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXJL	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.90%	13.54%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	18.59%	-4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	18.59%	-4.69%

UXJL vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UXJL and UXJA have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

UXJL vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXJL nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJL and UXJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, UXJL and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UXJL or UXJA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJL or UXJA?

UXJL and UXJA have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJL or UXJA?

UXJL and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.