UX vs. CSNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UX returned 17.18% vs 47.34% for CSNR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.

Performance

UX vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CSNR's 21.88% return.

UX

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -3.11%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 17.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSNR

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 21.88%
• 6M: 24.62%
• 1Y: 47.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UX vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	-0.61%	17.28%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	21.88%	26.55%

Correlation

The correlation between UX and CSNR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

UX vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UX

UX Risk / Return Rank: 17
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 86
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UX vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UX	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.81	-2.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.59	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.48	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	5.67	-4.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.45	22.27	-20.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UX vs. CSNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the CSNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UX and CSNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UX	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	2.81	-2.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	1.97	-1.67

Drawdowns

UX vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, which is greater than CSNR's maximum drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and CSNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	UX	CSNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.72%	-15.33%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.72%	-8.39%	-15.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.59%	-1.42%	-18.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-1.82%	-8.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.87%	2.13%	+9.74%

Volatility

UX vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) at 4.24%. This indicates that UX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UX	CSNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.07%	4.24%	+3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.59%	13.65%	+10.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.45%	16.94%	+17.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.20%	19.77%	+16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.20%	19.77%	+16.43%

UX vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UX vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison

UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than CSNR's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	1.98%	2.39%
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF	1.49%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UX and CSNR in my portfolio?

UX and CSNR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UX or CSNR?

UX has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to CSNR (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UX dropped -23.72% vs CSNR's -15.33%.

Which ETF is better, UX or CSNR?

On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 47.34% vs 17.18% for UX. On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CSNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UX or CSNR?

Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 47.34% return vs 17.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UX or CSNR?

CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UX or CSNR?

CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.49% for UX.

What is the main difference between UX and CSNR?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UX and 0.50% for CSNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.