UX vs. CSNR
UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UX is a Uranium fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UX returned -0.88% vs 31.06% for CSNR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.
Performance
UX vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than CSNR's 11.05% return.
UX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSNR
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UX vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | -5.87% | 13.91% |
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 11.05% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between UX and CSNR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UX vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank
UX
CSNR
UX vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UX | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.31 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.07 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 12.10 | -12.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UX vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, which is greater than CSNR's maximum drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and CSNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UX | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -15.33% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.92% | -10.18% | -14.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | -10.18% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -1.97% | -8.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.97% | 2.57% | +10.40% |
Volatility
UX vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) at 6.08%. This indicates that UX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UX | CSNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 6.08% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.25% | 14.51% | +9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.10% | 17.87% | +16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 20.02% | +15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 20.02% | +15.97% |
UX vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UX vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison
UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than CSNR's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 2.17% | 2.39% |
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | 1.57% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UX and CSNR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to CSNR (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UX dropped -24.92% vs CSNR's -15.33%.
On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 31.06% vs -0.88% for UX. On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CSNR has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 31.06% return vs -0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.
CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.57% for UX.
UX is categorized as Uranium, while CSNR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UX and 0.50% for CSNR.
CSNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UX and CSNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer