PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVV vs. HTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UVV vs. HTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Corporation (UVV) and H2O America (HTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVV achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than HTO's 18.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UVV has underperformed HTO with an annualized return of 5.30%, while HTO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.53% annualized return.


UVV

1D
1.26%
1M
0.24%
YTD
5.45%
6M
3.08%
1Y
-6.14%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
5.30%

HTO

1D
0.74%
1M
0.96%
YTD
18.36%
6M
18.21%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
-4.86%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
6.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVV vs. HTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UVV
Universal Corporation
5.45%2.27%-13.39%35.79%1.82%19.59%-8.96%11.08%7.79%-14.79%
HTO
H2O America
18.36%2.92%-22.57%-17.78%13.40%7.66%-0.43%30.19%-11.20%16.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UVV and HTO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1988

0.26

The correlation between UVV and HTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UVV:

$1.73

HTO:

$2.90

PE Ratio

UVV:

31.19

HTO:

19.70

PS Ratio

UVV:

0.46

HTO:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

UVV:

$2.21B

HTO:

$816.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UVV:

$412.39M

HTO:

$335.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

UVV:

$212.91M

HTO:

$273.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVV vs. HTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVV
UVV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HTO
HTO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVV vs. HTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Corporation (UVV) and H2O America (HTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UVVHTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

0.64

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

1.48

-2.22

UVV vs. HTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVV Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the HTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVV and HTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UVV vs. HTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVV drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, which is greater than HTO's maximum drawdown of -54.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVV and HTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVVHTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.75%

-54.53%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

-16.19%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

-35.14%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-42.85%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.68%

-42.85%

-2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.39%

-24.64%

+12.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-15.90%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.00%

6.98%

+2.02%

Volatility

UVV vs. HTO - Volatility Comparison

Universal Corporation (UVV) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to H2O America (HTO) at 6.85%. This indicates that UVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVVHTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

6.85%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

16.54%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.93%

23.12%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

24.06%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

29.56%

-0.62%

Dividends

UVV vs. HTO - Dividend Comparison

UVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than HTO's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTO
H2O America
3.01%3.43%3.25%2.33%1.77%1.86%1.85%1.69%2.01%1.63%1.45%2.63%
UVV
Universal Corporation
6.08%6.18%5.87%4.72%5.95%5.64%6.30%5.29%4.80%4.11%3.33%3.71%

Financials

UVV vs. HTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Corporation and H2O America. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B202220232024202520260
183.29M
(UVV) Total Revenue
(HTO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UVV and HTO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVV has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to HTO (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVV dropped -69.75% vs HTO's -54.53%.

HTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVV and HTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer