PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVAL.L vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while VNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQ values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, UVAL.L has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 13.99%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.03% annualized return.


UVAL.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
18.76%
YTD
31.16%
6M
34.50%
1Y
67.14%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
13.99%

VNQ

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
8.23%
6M
6.19%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
6.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UVAL.L
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF
31.16%19.90%6.56%9.53%-4.90%31.55%-1.54%22.51%-7.42%8.19%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
8.23%-4.11%6.64%6.26%-17.48%41.87%-7.41%24.01%-0.45%-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UVAL.L and VNQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.35

The correlation between UVAL.L and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UVAL.L
VNQ

Technology

41.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Communication Services

9.0%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Industrials

6.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Energy

3.6%
0.1%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
97.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

UVAL.L
41.0%
VNQ
0.3%

Financial Services

UVAL.L
11.6%
VNQ
0.1%

Healthcare

UVAL.L
9.1%
VNQ

-

Communication Services

UVAL.L
9.0%
VNQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UVAL.L
8.9%
VNQ

-

Industrials

UVAL.L
6.8%
VNQ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

UVAL.L
4.3%
VNQ

-

Energy

UVAL.L
3.6%
VNQ
0.1%

Utilities

UVAL.L
2.1%
VNQ

-

Real Estate

UVAL.L
1.8%
VNQ
97.3%

Basic Materials

UVAL.L
1.8%
VNQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVAL.L vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVAL.L
UVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UVAL.LVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.15

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.08

1.45

+10.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.84

4.09

+38.75

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVAL.L and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UVAL.LVNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

0.84

+4.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.19

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.29

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.28

+0.46

Drawdowns

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -57.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVAL.LVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-57.05%

+24.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.53%

-7.44%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-18.24%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-28.76%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-35.51%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-5.39%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-10.79%

+5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.63%

-1.07%

Volatility

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 3.11%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVAL.LVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.11%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

9.41%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

12.83%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

17.59%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

20.60%

-3.26%

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UVAL.L vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

UVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UVAL.L
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.69%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


UVAL.L and VNQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UVAL.L.

UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VNQ is REIT. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.13% for VNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVAL.L and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer