UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L
UVAL.L (SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UVAL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SPLW.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UVAL.L returned 23.73%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for SPLW.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.37% return.
UVAL.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 18.76%
- YTD
- 31.16%
- 6M
- 34.50%
- 1Y
- 67.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
SPLW.L
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVAL.L SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 31.16% | 19.90% | 6.56% | 9.53% | -4.90% | 9.98% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.37% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between UVAL.L and SPLW.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UVAL.L and SPLW.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Financial Services
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Healthcare
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Energy
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Real Estate
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
UVAL.L
SPLW.L
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UVAL.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.03 | +0.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.08 | 0.19 | +11.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.84 | 0.47 | +42.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UVAL.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96 | 0.13 | +4.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.43 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UVAL.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -14.28% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.53% | -7.51% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.03% | -10.82% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -7.07% | +7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -5.83% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.01% | -1.45% |
Volatility
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) at 4.02%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UVAL.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 4.02% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 8.67% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 11.16% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 12.99% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 12.99% | +4.35% |
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UVAL.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UVAL.L nor SPLW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UVAL.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPLW.L is S&P 500. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for UVAL.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer