UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

UVAL.L (SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and FGBL.L (First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UVAL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FGBL.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Global High Equity Income NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UVAL.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for FGBL.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FGBL.L.

Performance

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while FGBL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGBL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 24.55% return, which is significantly higher than FGBL.L's 13.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UVAL.L has outperformed FGBL.L with an annualized return of 11.91%, while FGBL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.

UVAL.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -2.43%
• 6M: 19.62%
• YTD: 24.55%
• 1Y: 49.87%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

FGBL.L

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 10.74%
• YTD: 13.76%
• 1Y: 29.77%
• 3Y*: 19.74%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UVAL.L SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF	24.55%	19.90%	6.56%	9.53%	-4.90%	31.55%	-1.54%	22.51%	-6.54%	7.18%
FGBL.L First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)	13.76%	30.51%	6.22%	11.15%	3.62%	10.79%	-8.84%	11.01%	-5.93%	11.89%

Correlation

The correlation between UVAL.L and FGBL.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2015	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between UVAL.L and FGBL.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVAL.L

UVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
UVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FGBL.L

FGBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FGBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FGBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FGBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UVAL.L	FGBL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.59	3.18	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.95	4.29	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.57	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.34	5.22	+3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.27	18.20	+6.08

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is comparable to the FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVAL.L and FGBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -43.04%, which is greater than FGBL.L's maximum drawdown of -40.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and FGBL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UVAL.L	FGBL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.04%	-40.36%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-5.68%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.03%	-12.45%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.03%	-12.45%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.84%	-29.44%	-4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-0.03%	-5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.98%	-8.01%	-4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.63%	+0.42%

Volatility

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FGBL.L) at 2.11%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGBL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UVAL.L	FGBL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	2.11%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	7.11%	+3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	9.33%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.66%	11.86%	+8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.39%	13.92%	+8.47%

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FGBL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

UVAL.L vs. FGBL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UVAL.L nor FGBL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UVAL.L and FGBL.L in my portfolio?

UVAL.L and FGBL.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UVAL.L or FGBL.L?

On fees, UVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UVAL.L or FGBL.L?

UVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FGBL.L.

What is the main difference between UVAL.L and FGBL.L?

UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FGBL.L is Dividend. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FGBL.L tracks Nasdaq Global High Equity Income NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.60% for FGBL.L.