UUP vs. PAAA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) and PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM. UUP is passively managed, while PAAA is actively managed. Over the past year, UUP returned 6.66% vs 5.14% for PAAA. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UUP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PAAA.

Performance

UUP vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than PAAA's 2.14% return.

UUP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 6.66%
• 3Y*: 4.21%
• 5Y*: 5.89%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

PAAA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUP vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.40%	-4.99%	13.50%	2.82%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.14%	5.37%	7.47%	3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between UUP and PAAA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between UUP and PAAA shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UUP vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUP

UUP Risk / Return Rank: 36
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUP vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UUP	PAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	10.94	-9.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	21.40	-19.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	6.66	-5.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	29.67	-27.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.89	183.78	-178.89

UUP vs. PAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the PAAA Sharpe Ratio of 10.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUP and PAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UUP vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and PAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UUP	PAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-1.04%	-21.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-0.17%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	0.00%	-3.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-0.02%	-8.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.36%	0.03%	+1.33%

Volatility

UUP vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) at 0.11%. This indicates that UUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UUP	PAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	0.11%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.23%	0.35%	+3.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.07%	0.47%	+5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.22%	0.97%	+6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.96%	0.97%	+5.99%

UUP vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UUP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

UUP vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than PAAA's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.88%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund	3.32%	3.43%	4.48%	6.44%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	2.03%	1.08%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UUP and PAAA in my portfolio?

UUP and PAAA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UUP or PAAA?

UUP has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to PAAA (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs PAAA's -1.04%.

Which ETF is better, UUP or PAAA?

On 1-year performance, UUP leads with 6.66% vs 5.14% for PAAA. On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UUP or PAAA?

Over the 1-year period, UUP has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UUP or PAAA?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UUP or PAAA?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 3.32% for UUP.

What is the main difference between UUP and PAAA?

UUP is categorized as Currency, while PAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUP and 0.19% for PAAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.94 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.