PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UUP vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UUP vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, UUP has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 3.13%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.


UUP

1D
0.00%
1M
1.60%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.41%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.13%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUP vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.40%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UUP and NVDA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

-0.12

The correlation between UUP and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (5 years) to -0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UUP vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUP vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UUPNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.07

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

4.94

-0.05

UUP vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUP and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UUP vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UUPNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-89.72%

+67.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-20.21%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

-36.88%

+26.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

-66.34%

+55.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

-66.34%

+52.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-12.86%

+9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-36.18%

+27.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

8.46%

-7.10%

Volatility

UUP vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is 1.24%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that UUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UUPNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

13.26%

-12.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

26.67%

-22.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

35.00%

-28.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.22%

51.76%

-44.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

49.84%

-42.88%

Dividends

UUP vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.32%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UUP and NVDA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to UUP (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UUP and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer