UTWY vs. IBGL
UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) and IBGL (iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTWY tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index while IBGL tracks the ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UTWY returned 4.46% vs 4.56% for IBGL. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UTWY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBGL.
Performance
UTWY vs. IBGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBGL's -0.23% return.
UTWY
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBGL
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWY vs. IBGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | -0.64% | 2.28% |
IBGL iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF | -0.23% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWY and IBGL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.98 |
The correlation between UTWY and IBGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWY vs. IBGL — Risk / Return Rank
UTWY
IBGL
UTWY vs. IBGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWY | IBGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 0.78 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.63 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 1.58 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWY | IBGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.06 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
UTWY vs. IBGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than IBGL's maximum drawdown of -9.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and IBGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWY | IBGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -9.37% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -7.23% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -4.38% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -4.03% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.89% | -0.42% |
Volatility
UTWY vs. IBGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 2.50%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWY | IBGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.67% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | 6.12% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 9.28% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 10.53% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 10.53% | +0.58% |
UTWY vs. IBGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGL's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTWY vs. IBGL - Dividend Comparison
UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, which matches IBGL's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGL iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF | 4.70% | 3.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, UTWY and IBGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBGL has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to UTWY (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs IBGL's -9.37%.
On 1-year performance, IBGL leads with 4.56% vs 4.46% for UTWY. On fees, IBGL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBGL has performed better with a 4.56% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBGL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWY.
IBGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.69% for UTWY.
UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while IBGL tracks ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.07% for IBGL.
UTWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWY and IBGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer