PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWY vs. IBGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWY vs. IBGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBGL's -0.23% return.


UTWY

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
-0.54%
5Y*
10Y*

IBGL

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.74%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWY vs. IBGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and IBGL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.98

The correlation between UTWY and IBGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWY vs. IBGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWY
UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IBGL
IBGL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWY vs. IBGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTWYIBGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

0.49

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

0.78

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.63

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.81

1.58

+0.23

UTWY vs. IBGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the IBGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWY and IBGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTWYIBGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.49

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.06

-0.14

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. IBGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than IBGL's maximum drawdown of -9.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and IBGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWYIBGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-9.37%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-7.23%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-4.38%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-4.03%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.89%

-0.42%

Volatility

UTWY vs. IBGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 2.50%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWYIBGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.67%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

6.12%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

9.28%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

10.53%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

10.53%

+0.58%

UTWY vs. IBGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGL's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTWY vs. IBGL - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, which matches IBGL's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBGL
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF
4.70%3.52%0.00%0.00%
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
4.69%4.62%4.56%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, UTWY and IBGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBGL has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to UTWY (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs IBGL's -9.37%.

On 1-year performance, IBGL leads with 4.56% vs 4.46% for UTWY. On fees, IBGL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBGL has performed better with a 4.56% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWY.

IBGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.69% for UTWY.

UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while IBGL tracks ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.07% for IBGL.

UTWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWY and IBGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer