UTWY vs. IBGK
UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) and IBGK (iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTWY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while IBGK is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2054 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UTWY returned 4.46% vs 4.74% for IBGK. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UTWY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBGK.
Performance
UTWY vs. IBGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBGK's -0.36% return.
UTWY
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBGK
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWY vs. IBGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | -0.64% | 4.82% | -1.70% |
IBGK iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF | -0.36% | 3.66% | -2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWY and IBGK is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between UTWY and IBGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWY vs. IBGK — Risk / Return Rank
UTWY
IBGK
UTWY vs. IBGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF (IBGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWY | IBGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 0.80 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.65 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 1.63 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWY | IBGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.02 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
UTWY vs. IBGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than IBGK's maximum drawdown of -14.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and IBGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWY | IBGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -14.62% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -7.29% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -9.19% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -8.06% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.92% | -0.45% |
Volatility
UTWY vs. IBGK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 2.50%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF (IBGK) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWY | IBGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.70% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | 6.20% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 9.36% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 11.81% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 11.81% | -0.70% |
UTWY vs. IBGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGK's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTWY vs. IBGK - Dividend Comparison
UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, which matches IBGK's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGK iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF | 4.72% | 4.59% | 3.15% | 0.00% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, UTWY and IBGK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBGK has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to UTWY (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs IBGK's -14.62%.
On 1-year performance, IBGK leads with 4.74% vs 4.46% for UTWY. On fees, IBGK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBGK has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBGK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWY.
IBGK has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.69% for UTWY.
UTWY is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBGK is Long-Term Bond. UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while IBGK tracks ICE 2054 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.07% for IBGK.
UTWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWY and IBGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer