UTSL vs. FUTG
UTSL (Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UTSL is passively managed, while FUTG is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTSL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
UTSL vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
UTSL
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -17.87%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- -5.29%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTSL vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.14% | -20.02% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTSL and FUTG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTSL vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank
UTSL
FUTG
UTSL vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTSL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTSL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.66 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
UTSL vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTSL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.55% | -86.19% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -84.29% | +58.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.23% | -40.35% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.34% | — | — |
Volatility
UTSL vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTSL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.41% | 136.01% | -92.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.02% | 136.01% | -83.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.28% | 136.01% | -76.73% |
UTSL vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTSL vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.80% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 3.61% | 1.15% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 5.01% | 1.46% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTSL and FUTG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UTSL.
UTSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for UTSL and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer