PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTSL vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTSL vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return.


UTSL

1D
2.00%
1M
8.79%
6M
17.29%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*

DBE

1D
6.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
62.18%
YTD
66.08%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTSL vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares
15.70%29.03%54.24%-35.55%-14.06%48.16%-38.58%81.07%-2.27%11.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
66.08%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%22.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UTSL and DBE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2017

0.03

The correlation between UTSL and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTSL vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTSL
UTSL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTSL vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTSLDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.26

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.16

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

6.57

-4.88

UTSL vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTSL and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTSL vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTSLDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.55%

-86.69%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.45%

-24.72%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.22%

-24.72%

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.01%

-38.74%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.81%

-36.95%

+22.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-57.20%

+24.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.62%

8.13%

+6.49%

Volatility

UTSL vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) have volatilities of 13.07% and 12.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTSLDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

12.49%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.61%

32.73%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.54%

36.03%

+8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.09%

29.89%

+22.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.13%

28.40%

+30.73%

UTSL vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTSL vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than DBE's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.33%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares
1.52%1.69%1.61%3.61%1.15%1.19%1.40%5.01%1.46%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTSL and DBE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTSL has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to DBE (12.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTSL dropped -79.55% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 16.54% vs 11.50% for UTSL. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 12.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UTSL.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.52% for UTSL.

UTSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTSL and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer