PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTRE vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTRE vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTRE achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.


UTRE

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
0.06%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDD

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.37%
YTD
4.32%
6M
2.24%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
-3.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTRE vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTRE
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF
-0.09%5.68%2.96%2.16%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
4.32%-8.17%-6.65%-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UTRE and BNDD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTRE vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTRE
UTRE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTRE vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTREBNDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

0.56

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

1.20

+4.90

UTRE vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTRE and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTREBNDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.32

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

-0.33

+1.58

Drawdowns

UTRE vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTRE and BNDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTREBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-30.87%

+28.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-6.09%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.86%

-20.75%

+18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-26.51%

+25.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-19.34%

+18.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

2.83%

-2.35%

Volatility

UTRE vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) is 0.58%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that UTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTREBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

2.21%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

8.11%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02%

10.59%

-8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.70%

13.38%

-10.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

13.38%

-10.68%

UTRE vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTRE vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

UTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than BNDD's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.61%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%
UTRE
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF
3.50%3.60%4.01%3.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTRE and BNDD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to UTRE (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTRE dropped -2.80% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

On 3-year performance, UTRE leads with 3.64% vs -3.91% for BNDD. On fees, UTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UTRE has performed better with a 3.64% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

BNDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 3.50% for UTRE.

They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTRE and 1.02% for BNDD.

UTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTRE and BNDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer