UTPIX vs. DXQLX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX).
UTPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jul 25, 2000. DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTPIX ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund | 11.02% | 19.28% | 27.74% | -15.46% | -2.31% | 23.33% | -8.87% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 15.83% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -11.33% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTPIX achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's -11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, UTPIX has underperformed DXQLX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while DXQLX has yielded a comparatively higher 29.62% annualized return.
UTPIX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
DXQLX
- 1D
- 6.38%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- -11.33%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- 34.39%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 29.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTPIX vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank
UTPIX
DXQLX
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.64 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 5.76 | -1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.09 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.01 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTPIX and DXQLX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison
UTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than DXQLX's 16.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTPIX ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund | 0.70% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 0.97% | 0.20% | 0.58% | 1.72% | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 1.41% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 16.69% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTPIX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, smaller than the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTPIX and DXQLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -97.24% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -22.05% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.73% | -60.79% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -87.23% | +36.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -16.89% | +11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.00% | -66.35% | +44.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 6.29% | -0.19% |
Volatility
UTPIX vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) is 7.73%, while Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that UTPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 11.85% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.71% | 22.83% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.94% | 40.60% | -16.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 42.31% | -16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.98% | 316.45% | -287.47% |