PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIP.L vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIP.L is traded in GBP, while SGOV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGOV values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIP.L achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.88% return.


UTIP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
-2.70%
5Y*
-2.60%
10Y*
41.75%

SGOV

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.88%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF
-0.61%-3.83%-0.45%-6.33%-8.86%4.03%-4.55%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.93%-3.18%7.11%-0.13%13.66%0.99%-9.79%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIP.L and SGOV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

0.62

The correlation between UTIP.L and SGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIP.L vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIP.L
UTIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UTIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIP.LSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.95

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

2.59

-2.21

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIP.L and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIP.LSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.75

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.55

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.17

+0.18

Drawdowns

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -15.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIP.L and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIP.LSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-15.77%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-5.17%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.48%

-9.80%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.38%

-15.77%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.46%

-5.94%

-15.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-8.18%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.90%

+1.37%

Volatility

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIP.LSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

1.77%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.86%

4.99%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.14%

6.60%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.35%

8.56%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.48%

8.50%

+109.98%

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTIP.L vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

UTIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%69.04%31.90%67.27%43.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIP.L and SGOV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for UTIP.L.

UTIP.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. UTIP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for UTIP.L and 0.09% for SGOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIP.L and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer