PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while IEMA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than IEMA.L's 27.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has outperformed IEMA.L with an annualized return of 10.77%, while IEMA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


UTIL.L

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.96%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
10.77%

IEMA.L

1D
-1.57%
1M
6.01%
YTD
27.03%
6M
29.09%
1Y
49.82%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
13.22%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%3.35%9.30%
IEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.03%18.46%14.71%6.15%-15.28%4.44%9.20%18.37%-9.91%19.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and IEMA.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between UTIL.L and IEMA.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
IEMA.L

Utilities

95.4%
2.1%

Industrials

4.6%
7.5%

Basic Materials

-

6.5%

Communication Services

-

6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.0%

Energy

-

4.1%

Financial Services

-

19.4%

Healthcare

-

2.9%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

36.8%

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.4%
IEMA.L
2.1%

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.6%
IEMA.L
7.5%

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
6.5%

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
3.0%

Energy

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
4.1%

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
19.4%

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
2.9%

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
1.1%

Technology

UTIL.L

-

IEMA.L
36.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMA.L
IEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIL.LIEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

4.61

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

16.47

-5.92

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and IEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIL.LIEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.62

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.39

+0.11

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMA.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and IEMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LIEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-35.69%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-10.75%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-18.12%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-23.81%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-32.06%

-2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-2.58%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-10.76%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.02%

-0.44%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) is 6.02%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that UTIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LIEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

8.03%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

16.03%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

18.95%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

17.34%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

18.88%

-1.17%

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UTIL.L and IEMA.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTIL.L nor IEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and IEMA.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L and IEMA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IEMA.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and IEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer