UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L
UTIL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF) and IEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UTIL.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L returned 10.77%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for IEMA.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while IEMA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than IEMA.L's 27.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has outperformed IEMA.L with an annualized return of 10.77%, while IEMA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.
UTIL.L
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
IEMA.L
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 49.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTIL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF | 13.22% | 33.98% | 1.33% | 13.09% | -6.77% | 8.27% | 11.82% | 29.32% | 3.35% | 9.30% |
IEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.03% | 18.46% | 14.71% | 6.15% | -15.28% | 4.44% | 9.20% | 18.37% | -9.91% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTIL.L and IEMA.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UTIL.L and IEMA.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTIL.L
IEMA.L
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UTIL.L
IEMA.L
Industrials
UTIL.L
IEMA.L
Basic Materials
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Communication Services
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Consumer Cyclical
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Consumer Defensive
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Energy
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Financial Services
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Healthcare
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Real Estate
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Technology
UTIL.L
-
IEMA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
UTIL.L
IEMA.L
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTIL.L | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 4.61 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.55 | 16.47 | -5.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTIL.L | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.62 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.48 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.39 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMA.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and IEMA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTIL.L | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -35.69% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -10.75% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -18.12% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -23.81% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -32.06% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.93% | -2.58% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -10.76% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.02% | -0.44% |
Volatility
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) is 6.02%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that UTIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTIL.L | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 8.03% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 16.03% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 18.95% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 17.34% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 18.88% | -1.17% |
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UTIL.L and IEMA.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTIL.L vs. IEMA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UTIL.L nor IEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UTIL.L and IEMA.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UTIL.L and IEMA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IEMA.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and IEMA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer