UTES vs. VPC
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and VPC (Virtus Private Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while VPC is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Indxx Private Credit Index. UTES is actively managed, while VPC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTES returned 15.66%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for VPC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VPC.
Performance
UTES vs. VPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -9.26% return.
UTES
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
VPC
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
UTES vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.08% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 19.03% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | -9.26% | -6.75% | 10.52% | 22.20% | -11.70% | 34.18% | -9.50% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and VPC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UTES and VPC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UTES vs. VPC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
VPC
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UTES
VPC
-
Basic Materials
UTES
-
VPC
-
Communication Services
UTES
-
VPC
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
VPC
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
VPC
-
Energy
UTES
-
VPC
Financial Services
UTES
-
VPC
Healthcare
UTES
-
VPC
Industrials
UTES
-
VPC
Real Estate
UTES
-
VPC
-
Technology
UTES
-
VPC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
VPC
UTES vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTES | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.85 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.57 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | -1.13 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTES | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | -0.98 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.09 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.20 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
UTES vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum VPC drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and VPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -53.45% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -22.76% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -24.86% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -24.86% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -19.63% | +10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -7.67% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 11.45% | -5.37% |
Volatility
UTES vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) at 3.27%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | VPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 3.27% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.95% | 10.85% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 13.17% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 13.50% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 20.56% | -0.40% |
UTES vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than VPC's 17.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.50% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
VPC Virtus Private Credit ETF | 17.30% | 14.33% | 11.26% | 11.71% | 10.74% | 6.31% | 10.06% | 8.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and VPC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to VPC (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs VPC's -53.45%.
On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 15.66% vs 1.17% for VPC. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.
VPC has the higher dividend yield at 17.30%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VPC is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.75% for VPC.
UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and VPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer