PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. VPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. VPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -9.26% return.


UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%

VPC

1D
-1.89%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-9.26%
6M
-10.18%
1Y
-12.88%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%19.03%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
-9.26%-6.75%10.52%22.20%-11.70%34.18%-9.50%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and VPC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between UTES and VPC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UTES vs. VPC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTES
VPC

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

98.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.3%

Utilities

UTES
100.0%
VPC

-

Basic Materials

UTES

-

VPC

-

Communication Services

UTES

-

VPC
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UTES

-

VPC
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

UTES

-

VPC

-

Energy

UTES

-

VPC
0.0%

Financial Services

UTES

-

VPC
98.3%

Healthcare

UTES

-

VPC
0.0%

Industrials

UTES

-

VPC
0.1%

Real Estate

UTES

-

VPC

-

Technology

UTES

-

VPC
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTESVPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.85

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

-0.57

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

-1.13

+2.42

UTES vs. VPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the VPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and VPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTESVPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.98

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.09

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.20

+0.50

Drawdowns

UTES vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum VPC drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and VPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESVPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-53.45%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-22.76%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-24.86%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-24.86%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-19.63%

+10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-7.67%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

11.45%

-5.37%

Volatility

UTES vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Virtus Private Credit ETF (VPC) at 3.27%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESVPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

3.27%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

10.85%

+6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

13.17%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

13.50%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

20.56%

-0.40%

UTES vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than VPC's 17.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit ETF
17.30%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and VPC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to VPC (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs VPC's -53.45%.

On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 15.66% vs 1.17% for VPC. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, VPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VPC.

VPC has the higher dividend yield at 17.30%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VPC is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.75% for VPC.

UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and VPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer