PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. VCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTES vs. VCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTES vs. VCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
2.56%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%11.03%
VCLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
10.41%55.75%-6.69%-17.54%-7.87%-5.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than VCLN's 10.41% return.


UTES

1D
0.95%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
2.56%
6M
-3.09%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
12.94%

VCLN

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
10.41%
6M
17.13%
1Y
72.50%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTES vs. VCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than VCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. VCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VCLN
VCLN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. VCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTESVCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

2.44

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

3.16

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

5.81

-3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.77

21.39

-16.62

UTES vs. VCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the VCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and VCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTESVCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.44

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.12

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and VCLN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UTES vs. VCLN - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VCLN's 1.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.46%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
VCLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
1.82%2.01%1.16%1.14%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTES vs. VCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum VCLN drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and VCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESVCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-45.66%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-12.58%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-5.09%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-24.92%

+19.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

3.42%

+2.19%

Volatility

UTES vs. VCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 8.04%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTESVCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

9.57%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.29%

21.32%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

29.83%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

27.34%

-7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

27.34%

-7.31%