UTES vs. UYM
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while UYM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). UTES is actively managed, while UYM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTES returned 12.27%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for UYM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UYM.
Performance
UTES vs. UYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 27.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UTES having a 12.27% annualized return and UYM not far ahead at 12.48%.
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
UYM
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 27.95%
- 6M
- 30.38%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
UTES vs. UYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 27.95% | 9.46% | -8.00% | 17.47% | -23.10% | 54.58% | 16.56% | 35.09% | -35.68% | 51.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and UYM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.30 |
The correlation between UTES and UYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UTES vs. UYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
UYM
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTES
UYM
-
Basic Materials
UTES
-
UYM
Communication Services
UTES
-
UYM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
UYM
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
UYM
-
Energy
UTES
-
UYM
-
Financial Services
UTES
-
UYM
-
Healthcare
UTES
-
UYM
-
Industrials
UTES
-
UYM
Real Estate
UTES
-
UYM
-
Technology
UTES
-
UYM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. UYM — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
UYM
UTES vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.38 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 3.67 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and UYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -92.77% | +57.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -23.85% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -43.88% | +26.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -48.25% | +27.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -73.31% | +37.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -7.32% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -42.06% | +36.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 8.95% | -2.66% |
Volatility
UTES vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 7.23%, while ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 14.01% | -6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 27.29% | -10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 35.09% | -13.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 39.49% | -18.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 42.86% | -22.69% |
UTES vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than UYM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than UYM's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 1.19% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 0.28% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and UYM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs UYM's -92.77%.
On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 12.48% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYM.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.19% for UYM.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while UYM is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.95% for UYM.
UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and UYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer