UTES vs. URAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while URAN is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. UTES is actively managed, while URAN is passively managed. Over the past year, UTES returned 7.86% vs 28.74% for URAN. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

UTES vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than URAN's 5.17% return.

UTES

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 6M: -1.81%
• 1Y: 7.86%
• 3Y*: 22.78%
• 5Y*: 15.66%
• 10Y*: 12.40%

URAN

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	0.08%	25.71%	1.29%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	5.17%	49.05%	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and URAN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.50

The correlation between UTES and URAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UTES vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 14
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 15

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 22
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTES	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.73	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.25	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.15	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	1.14	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	2.27	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTES vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTES	URAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	0.73	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.87	-0.17

Drawdowns

UTES vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTES	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-31.96%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-25.31%	+11.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.26%	-20.16%	+10.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-10.75%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	12.71%	-6.63%

Volatility

UTES vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 7.40%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTES	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	12.29%	-4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.95%	29.33%	-12.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.27%	39.47%	-18.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	39.13%	-18.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.16%	39.13%	-18.97%

UTES vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTES vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than URAN's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.44%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.50%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTES and URAN in my portfolio?

UTES and URAN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTES or URAN?

URAN has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to UTES (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs URAN's -31.96%.

Which ETF is better, UTES or URAN?

On 1-year performance, URAN leads with 28.74% vs 7.86% for UTES. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTES or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, URAN has performed better with a 28.74% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTES or URAN?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTES or URAN?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.50% for UTES.

What is the main difference between UTES and URAN?

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while URAN is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.