PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. URAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than URAN's -10.15% return.


UTES

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.90%
6M
3.82%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
13.64%

URAN

1D
2.57%
1M
-2.34%
6M
-22.93%
YTD
-10.15%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$138.72K$486.15K$431.80K
$11.31M$10.12M$13.80M

UTES vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.36%25.71%0.98%
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
-10.15%49.05%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and URAN is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

URAN
URAN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTESURANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.04

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

0.07

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

0.13

-0.52

UTES vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, roughly equal to the maximum URAN drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and URAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESURANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-35.21%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-35.21%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.00%

-31.80%

+22.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-12.42%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

17.48%

-10.74%

Volatility

UTES vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 5.50%, while Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESURANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

9.88%

-4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

28.60%

-12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.46%

40.15%

-18.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

38.93%

-18.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.27%

38.93%

-18.66%

UTES vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than URAN's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
2.85%2.56%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.51%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and URAN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URAN has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to UTES (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs URAN's -35.21%.

On 1-year performance, URAN leads with 2.32% vs -2.59% for UTES. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, URAN has performed better with a 2.32% return vs -2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.51% for UTES.

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while URAN is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.35% for URAN.

URAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and URAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer