PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 11.78%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.


UTES

1D
-0.03%
1M
-2.93%
6M
0.59%
YTD
-1.07%
1Y
-4.33%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
11.78%
ALL TIME*
13.50%

LLY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-3.60%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.26%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
37.33%
5Y*
37.67%
10Y*
32.12%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.62B$2.84B$3.35B
$11.16M$10.04M$13.72M

UTES vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
-1.07%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.26%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and LLY is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.22

The correlation between UTES and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTESLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.28

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

2.44

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

6.60

-7.25

UTES vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-68.24%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-23.18%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-34.48%

+16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-34.48%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

-34.48%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-7.02%

-3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-19.17%

+13.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.72%

8.56%

-1.84%

Volatility

UTES vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 5.50%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

8.88%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

27.69%

-11.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

38.37%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

32.64%

-11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

30.37%

-10.11%

Dividends

UTES vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than LLY's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.53%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and LLY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to UTES (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer