UTES vs. HDIF.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and HDIF.TO (Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while HDIF.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTES returned 22.00%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for HDIF.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for HDIF.TO.

Performance

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UTES is traded in USD, while HDIF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HDIF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than HDIF.TO's 9.21% return.

UTES

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 8.95%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

HDIF.TO

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 24.82%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	0.26%	25.71%	45.35%	-2.46%	10.07%
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	9.21%	21.23%	9.19%	15.51%	-19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and HDIF.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022	0.43

The correlation between UTES and HDIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UTES	HDIF.TO
Utilities	100.0%	5.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-	15.6%
Healthcare	-	11.4%
Industrials	-	9.4%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Technology	-	27.6%

Return for Risk

UTES vs. HDIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 16
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 15
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 17

HDIF.TO

HDIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HDIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HDIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HDIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HDIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTES	HDIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	1.74	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	2.39	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.31	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	2.50	-1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	10.94	-9.62

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and HDIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than HDIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and HDIF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTES	HDIF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-31.09%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-9.64%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-20.89%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.10%	-1.78%	-7.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-9.69%	+4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.29%	2.19%	+4.10%

Volatility

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) at 4.55%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTES	HDIF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	4.55%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	11.22%	+5.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.32%	13.83%	+7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	18.61%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.17%	18.61%	+1.56%

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HDIF.TO's 2.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTES vs. HDIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than HDIF.TO's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	10.23%	9.95%	10.14%	10.59%	8.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.49%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTES and HDIF.TO in my portfolio?

UTES and HDIF.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UTES or HDIF.TO?

On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTES or HDIF.TO?

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

What is the main difference between UTES and HDIF.TO?

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HDIF.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 2.47% for HDIF.TO.