PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. ECLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTES vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTES vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
2.56%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%4.80%
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
13.79%16.78%22.60%-3.36%5.28%12.26%8.98%5.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than ECLN's 13.79% return.


UTES

1D
0.95%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
2.56%
6M
-3.09%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
12.94%

ECLN

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
13.79%
6M
13.18%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTES vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ECLN
ECLN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ECLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ECLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTESECLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.87

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.48

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.89

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.77

12.20

-7.43

UTES vs. ECLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the ECLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and ECLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTESECLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.87

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.70

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and ECLN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UTES vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than ECLN's 1.80% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.46%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
1.80%1.97%2.52%2.54%1.72%1.66%1.68%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTES vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than ECLN's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and ECLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESECLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-32.28%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-8.45%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-19.88%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-0.73%

-6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.07%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

2.00%

+3.61%

Volatility

UTES vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) at 2.82%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTESECLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

2.82%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.29%

7.36%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

12.76%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

14.16%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

17.51%

+2.52%