UTES vs. ASA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) is Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while ASA (ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, UTES returned 12.14%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for ASA. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

UTES vs. ASA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than ASA's -15.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UTES having a 12.14% annualized return and ASA not far ahead at 12.15%.

UTES

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 3.82%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 1Y: -2.59%
• 3Y*: 22.82%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 12.14%
• ALL TIME*: 13.64%

ASA

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: -7.80%
• 6M: -20.43%
• YTD: -15.77%
• 1Y: 62.08%
• 3Y*: 49.87%
• 5Y*: 18.04%
• 10Y*: 12.15%
• ALL TIME*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	$2.83M	$2.99M	$5.37M
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	$11.31M	$10.12M	$13.80M

UTES vs. ASA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	0.36%	25.71%	45.35%	-2.46%	0.80%	20.74%	-0.30%	25.48%	5.14%	14.21%
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	-15.77%	195.60%	34.55%	5.38%	-32.06%	-3.48%	60.65%	44.35%	-16.18%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and ASA is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.19

Return for Risk

UTES vs. ASA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 9
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 9
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ASA

ASA Risk / Return Rank: 75
ASA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ASA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ASA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ASA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ASA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES vs. ASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTES	ASA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	1.24	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	1.69	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.22	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	1.53	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	3.42	-3.80

UTES vs. ASA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the ASA Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and ASA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTES vs. ASA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum ASA drawdown of -80.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and ASA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTES	ASA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-80.36%	+44.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-40.80%	+26.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-40.80%	+23.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-48.43%	+28.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	-51.66%	+16.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.00%	-38.17%	+29.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-42.51%	+36.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.74%	18.22%	-11.48%

Volatility

UTES vs. ASA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) is 5.50%, while ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that UTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTES	ASA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	12.20%	-6.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.23%	39.41%	-23.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.46%	50.34%	-28.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.75%	35.96%	-15.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.27%	35.59%	-15.32%

Dividends

UTES vs. ASA - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than ASA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited	0.14%	0.10%	0.20%	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.32%	0.35%	0.36%	0.56%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.51%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTES and ASA in my portfolio?

UTES and ASA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTES or ASA?

ASA has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to UTES (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs ASA's -80.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.