ASA vs. CLG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO).
CLG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASA or CLG.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between ASA and CLG.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASA vs. CLG.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASA:
3.22
CLG.TO:
1.77
ASA:
3.85
CLG.TO:
2.67
ASA:
1.49
CLG.TO:
1.33
ASA:
1.47
CLG.TO:
1.14
ASA:
14.96
CLG.TO:
8.60
ASA:
5.97%
CLG.TO:
0.78%
ASA:
27.88%
CLG.TO:
3.79%
ASA:
-85.03%
CLG.TO:
-10.74%
ASA:
-23.54%
CLG.TO:
-1.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASA achieves a 26.56% return, which is significantly higher than CLG.TO's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ASA has outperformed CLG.TO with an annualized return of 9.00%, while CLG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
ASA
26.56%
17.33%
30.69%
85.96%
12.80%
9.00%
CLG.TO
0.56%
0.68%
1.59%
7.12%
1.12%
1.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASA vs. CLG.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASA
CLG.TO
ASA vs. CLG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASA vs. CLG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ASA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than CLG.TO's 2.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.56% | 0.40% |
CLG.TO iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.53% | 2.53% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 2.61% | 2.59% | 2.88% | 3.02% | 3.17% | 3.25% | 3.34% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
ASA vs. CLG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASA drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, which is greater than CLG.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASA and CLG.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASA vs. CLG.TO - Volatility Comparison
ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLG.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that ASA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.