PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) and Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than EDGE.TO's 19.17% return.


UTES.TO

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.62%
6M
5.91%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.16%

EDGE.TO

1D
4.03%
1M
1.04%
6M
24.00%
YTD
19.17%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$35.11KCA$33.39KCA$26.42K
CA$3.53MCA$2.89MCA$2.74M

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund
9.53%18.66%-4.15%
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
19.17%11.95%9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and EDGE.TO is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

-0.09

The correlation between UTES.TO and EDGE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EDGE.TO
EDGE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EDGE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) and Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTES.TOEDGE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.30

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

3.05

+3.66

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the EDGE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and EDGE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum EDGE.TO drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and EDGE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOEDGE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-39.86%

+29.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-18.43%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-3.75%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-12.83%

+10.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

7.82%

-5.56%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) is 4.83%, while Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that UTES.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDGE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOEDGE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

7.18%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

18.01%

-9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

20.88%

-10.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.46%

22.86%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.46%

23.69%

-12.23%

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGE.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. EDGE.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.50%, more than EDGE.TO's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
0.41%0.36%0.53%0.06%0.08%0.05%0.06%0.09%0.09%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund
18.50%18.30%6.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES.TO and EDGE.TO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDGE.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDGE.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for UTES.TO.

UTES.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while EDGE.TO is Technology Equities. UTES.TO tracks Solactive Canada Utility Index, while EDGE.TO tracks Solactive Global Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for UTES.TO and 0.67% for EDGE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES.TO and EDGE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer