PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE.TO vs. AMTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EDGE.TO is traded in CAD, while AMTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


EDGE.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.20%
6M
11.39%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.58%

AMTR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$27.25KCA$23.58KCA$26.33K

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
12.54%11.95%17.11%25.65%-33.70%12.46%16.18%
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%55.02%10.07%28.04%36.92%11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGE.TO and AMTR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020

0.23

The correlation between EDGE.TO and AMTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGE.TO
EDGE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EDGE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AMTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Innovation Index Fund (EDGE.TO) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGE.TOAMTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGE.TOAMTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

Volatility

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGE.TOAMTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE.TO vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison

EDGE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDGE.TO
Evolve Innovation Index Fund
0.44%0.36%0.53%0.06%0.08%0.05%0.06%0.09%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGE.TO and AMTR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDGE.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDGE.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMTR.

EDGE.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while AMTR is MLPs. EDGE.TO tracks Solactive Global Innovation Index, while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve Funds Group Inc. and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for EDGE.TO and 0.75% for AMTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE.TO and AMTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer