PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USTY.L vs. TLH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USTY.L vs. TLH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USTY.L is traded in GBP, while TLH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLH values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USTY.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than TLH's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, USTY.L has outperformed TLH with an annualized return of 2.28%, while TLH has yielded a comparatively lower -0.01% annualized return.


USTY.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.98%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.18%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.28%

TLH

1D
0.00%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-1.10%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-2.74%
10Y*
-0.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USTY.L vs. TLH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.66%0.10%3.36%-1.37%-1.66%-0.86%4.57%4.20%7.22%-6.43%
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.05%-1.12%-2.54%-1.17%-16.35%-4.48%10.43%5.92%6.32%-4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between USTY.L and TLH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015

0.71

The correlation between USTY.L and TLH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USTY.L vs. TLH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TLH
TLH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLH Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USTY.L vs. TLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTY.LTLHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.79

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

1.70

+1.46

USTY.L vs. TLH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USTY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the TLH Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USTY.L and TLH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTY.LTLHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.63

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.20

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

-0.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.37

-0.06

Drawdowns

USTY.L vs. TLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USTY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.02%, smaller than the maximum TLH drawdown of -42.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTY.L and TLH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTY.LTLHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.02%

-42.25%

+19.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-6.82%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.75%

-12.85%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.04%

-29.52%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

-42.25%

+19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.58%

-37.59%

+22.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-14.94%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.16%

-1.26%

Volatility

USTY.L vs. TLH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH) at 1.97%. This indicates that USTY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTY.LTLHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.97%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

6.34%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

8.57%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.77%

13.58%

-4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

13.80%

-3.78%

USTY.L vs. TLH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USTY.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TLH's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USTY.L vs. TLH - Dividend Comparison

USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than TLH's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLH
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.50%4.17%4.28%3.83%2.78%1.50%2.65%2.31%2.17%1.83%1.91%2.13%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USTY.L and TLH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLH.

USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while TLH tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for USTY.L and 0.15% for TLH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USTY.L and TLH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer