PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USTB vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USTB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USTB achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 6.99% return.


USTB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.81%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USTB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
1.23%6.08%6.49%6.69%-2.82%0.90%5.12%5.10%1.08%0.35%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
6.99%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USTB and YCS is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USTB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USTB
USTB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
USTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USTB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTBYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.96

2.05

+1.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.76

2.59

+4.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.37

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

3.95

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.05

12.35

+11.70

USTB vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USTB Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USTB and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTBYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

2.05

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.76

1.10

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

0.33

+1.40

Drawdowns

USTB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USTB drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTB and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTBYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-49.56%

+44.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-8.30%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.02%

-23.05%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.96%

-27.32%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-19.94%

+19.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

2.66%

-2.47%

Volatility

USTB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) is 0.34%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that USTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTBYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

2.75%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.84%

12.36%

-11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26%

17.38%

-16.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.01%

21.11%

-19.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.01%

19.02%

-17.01%

USTB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

USTB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

USTB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

USTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
4.58%4.62%5.05%4.49%2.54%1.84%2.59%2.69%2.32%0.43%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USTB and YCS have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to USTB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USTB dropped -5.32% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.16% vs 3.52% for USTB. On fees, USTB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, USTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.16% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USTB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

USTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. USTB tracks Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Victory and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for USTB and 1.00% for YCS.

USTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USTB and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer