PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSL.TO achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly lower than XVLU.TO's 50.62% return.


USSL.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
8.62%
YTD
14.51%
6M
12.52%
1Y
37.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XVLU.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
23.30%
YTD
50.62%
6M
51.55%
1Y
95.75%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USSL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF
14.51%13.42%22.04%
XVLU.TO
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF
50.62%26.17%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between USSL.TO and XVLU.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024

0.37

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSL.TO
XVLU.TO

Technology

33.1%
44.5%

Financial Services

12.3%
10.4%

Communication Services

10.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.5%

Industrials

8.7%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.0%

Energy

3.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.5%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.6%

Technology

USSL.TO
33.1%
XVLU.TO
44.5%

Financial Services

USSL.TO
12.3%
XVLU.TO
10.4%

Communication Services

USSL.TO
10.7%
XVLU.TO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USSL.TO
10.1%
XVLU.TO
8.4%

Healthcare

USSL.TO
9.8%
XVLU.TO
8.5%

Industrials

USSL.TO
8.7%
XVLU.TO
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

USSL.TO
5.4%
XVLU.TO
4.0%

Energy

USSL.TO
3.5%
XVLU.TO
3.2%

Utilities

USSL.TO
2.5%
XVLU.TO
1.9%

Real Estate

USSL.TO
2.0%
XVLU.TO
1.8%

Basic Materials

USSL.TO
1.9%
XVLU.TO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSL.TO
USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XVLU.TO
XVLU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XVLU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVLU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSL.TOXVLU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

5.59

-2.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.04

7.16

-3.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.96

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

13.34

-9.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.89

55.16

-42.27

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the XVLU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSL.TO and XVLU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSL.TOXVLU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

5.59

-2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.93

+0.37

Drawdowns

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSL.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum XVLU.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSL.TO and XVLU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSL.TOXVLU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-34.40%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-7.22%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-6.49%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.74%

+1.15%

Volatility

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) is 5.02%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF (XVLU.TO) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that USSL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XVLU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSL.TOXVLU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

7.55%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

14.06%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

17.24%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

15.94%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

18.82%

+0.81%

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSL.TO has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XVLU.TO's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSL.TO vs. XVLU.TO - Dividend Comparison

USSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XVLU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
USSL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XVLU.TO
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor Index ETF
1.12%1.75%2.17%2.26%2.51%2.03%2.72%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSL.TO and XVLU.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XVLU.TO is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XVLU.TO is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.34% for USSL.TO.

USSL.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XVLU.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. USSL.TO tracks S&P 500, while XVLU.TO tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.34% for USSL.TO and 0.32% for XVLU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSL.TO and XVLU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer