USSG vs. NACP
USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USSG returned 13.79%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USSG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
USSG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
USSG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
USSG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 9.51% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 18.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSG and NACP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between USSG and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
USSG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSG
NACP
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
USSG
NACP
Communication Services
USSG
NACP
Financial Services
USSG
NACP
Healthcare
USSG
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
USSG
NACP
Industrials
USSG
NACP
Consumer Defensive
USSG
NACP
Real Estate
USSG
NACP
Basic Materials
USSG
NACP
Energy
USSG
NACP
Utilities
USSG
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
USSG
NACP
USSG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 4.56 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | 20.04 | -9.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 3.14 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.92 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.93 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
USSG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -30.96% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -9.65% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -19.66% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -27.89% | +0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.13% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -5.75% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.19% | +0.42% |
Volatility
USSG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) is 3.77%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that USSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 4.44% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 11.13% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 14.02% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 17.47% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 18.70% | +1.46% |
USSG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USSG and NACP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to USSG (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 13.79% for USSG. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USSG and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer