PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSG vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSG vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return.


USSG

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.67%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.19%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*

ILCG

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.68%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.61%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSG vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
9.51%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
14.48%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%20.06%

Correlation

The correlation between USSG and ILCG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.93

The correlation between USSG and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

USSG vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSG
ILCG

Technology

36.9%
49.8%

Communication Services

14.5%
14.5%

Financial Services

10.6%
6.0%

Healthcare

9.6%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.6%

Industrials

8.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.1%

Energy

2.1%
0.5%

Utilities

1.1%
0.8%

Technology

USSG
36.9%
ILCG
49.8%

Communication Services

USSG
14.5%
ILCG
14.5%

Financial Services

USSG
10.6%
ILCG
6.0%

Healthcare

USSG
9.6%
ILCG
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USSG
8.6%
ILCG
10.6%

Industrials

USSG
8.1%
ILCG
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

USSG
4.2%
ILCG
1.6%

Real Estate

USSG
2.2%
ILCG
1.4%

Basic Materials

USSG
2.1%
ILCG
1.1%

Energy

USSG
2.1%
ILCG
0.5%

Utilities

USSG
1.1%
ILCG
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSG vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSG vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSGILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.89

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

6.68

+4.05

USSG vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSG and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSGILCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.82

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Drawdowns

USSG vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSGILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-52.98%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-15.65%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-23.10%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.00%

-35.38%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.02%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-8.22%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.43%

-1.82%

Volatility

USSG vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) is 3.77%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that USSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSGILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.40%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

12.81%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

16.31%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

22.00%

-4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

21.53%

-1.37%

USSG vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSG vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.95%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, USSG and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to USSG (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 14.95% vs 13.79% for USSG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for USSG.

USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.04% for ILCG.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSG and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer