USSC.L vs. ENGE.L
USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and ENGE.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ENGE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USSC.L returned 19.32%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for ENGE.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USSC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGE.L.
Performance
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USSC.L is traded in USD, while ENGE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than ENGE.L's 34.21% return.
USSC.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 12.93%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
ENGE.L
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 34.21%
- 6M
- 31.56%
- 1Y
- 56.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 12.93% | 14.73% | 8.33% | 23.17% | -9.08% |
ENGE.L SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 34.21% | 29.19% | -10.70% | 11.50% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSC.L and ENGE.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USSC.L and ENGE.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L — Risk / Return Rank
USSC.L
ENGE.L
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSC.L | ENGE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 5.75 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 18.39 | -4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSC.L | ENGE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than ENGE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and ENGE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSC.L | ENGE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.99% | -24.19% | -24.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -9.81% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -23.33% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -5.04% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -6.42% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 3.07% | -0.53% |
Volatility
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) is 4.04%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that USSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSC.L | ENGE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 8.18% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 19.04% | -8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 22.30% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 24.32% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 24.32% | -1.50% |
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USSC.L nor ENGE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USSC.L and ENGE.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.
USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ENGE.L is Energy Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.18% for ENGE.L.
Find the right allocation for USSC.L and ENGE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer