PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. ENGE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USSC.L is traded in USD, while ENGE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than ENGE.L's 34.21% return.


USSC.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.58%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
12.01%

ENGE.L

1D
1.69%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
34.21%
6M
31.56%
1Y
56.68%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
12.93%14.73%8.33%23.17%-9.08%
ENGE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
34.21%29.19%-10.70%11.50%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and ENGE.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between USSC.L and ENGE.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGE.L
ENGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.LENGE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

5.75

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

18.39

-4.29

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the ENGE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and ENGE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.LENGE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.53

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than ENGE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and ENGE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.LENGE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-24.19%

-24.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-9.81%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-23.33%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-5.04%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-6.42%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.07%

-0.53%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) is 4.04%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGE.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that USSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.LENGE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

8.18%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

19.04%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

22.30%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

24.32%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

24.32%

-1.50%

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. ENGE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSC.L nor ENGE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and ENGE.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENGE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENGE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ENGE.L is Energy Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ENGE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.18% for ENGE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and ENGE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer