PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than ACWD.L's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


USSC.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.58%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
12.01%

ACWD.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
13.24%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
12.93%14.73%8.33%23.17%-10.14%35.22%8.76%23.19%-15.30%9.79%
ACWD.L
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
11.57%22.83%17.76%22.27%-18.37%18.77%15.91%25.80%-9.85%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and ACWD.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.76

The correlation between USSC.L and ACWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSC.L
ACWD.L

Financial Services

19.8%
16.5%

Industrials

14.7%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
9.3%

Energy

11.2%
4.3%

Technology

9.4%
29.2%

Healthcare

7.5%
8.0%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Financial Services

USSC.L
19.8%
ACWD.L
16.5%

Industrials

USSC.L
14.7%
ACWD.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

USSC.L
14.0%
ACWD.L
9.3%

Energy

USSC.L
11.2%
ACWD.L
4.3%

Technology

USSC.L
9.4%
ACWD.L
29.2%

Healthcare

USSC.L
7.5%
ACWD.L
8.0%

Real Estate

USSC.L
6.2%
ACWD.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

USSC.L
6.1%
ACWD.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

USSC.L
6.0%
ACWD.L
4.9%

Communication Services

USSC.L
2.7%
ACWD.L
9.0%

Utilities

USSC.L
2.5%
ACWD.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWD.L
ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.LACWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.39

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

14.15

-0.04

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and ACWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.LACWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.36

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.73

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.80

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.73

-0.27

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and ACWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.LACWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-33.64%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-8.73%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-16.51%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-26.18%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

-33.64%

-15.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.66%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-4.67%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.09%

+0.45%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) have volatilities of 4.04% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.LACWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.87%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

9.89%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

12.56%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

15.58%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

15.85%

+6.97%

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSC.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and ACWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer