USSC.L vs. ACWD.L
USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L returned 12.01%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for ACWD.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USSC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than ACWD.L's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
USSC.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 12.93%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 12.93% | 14.73% | 8.33% | 23.17% | -10.14% | 35.22% | 8.76% | 23.19% | -15.30% | 9.79% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 11.57% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between USSC.L and ACWD.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.76 |
The correlation between USSC.L and ACWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Industrials
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Energy
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Technology
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Healthcare
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Real Estate
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Basic Materials
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Defensive
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Communication Services
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Utilities
USSC.L
ACWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
USSC.L
ACWD.L
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 3.39 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 14.15 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.73 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.99% | -33.64% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -8.73% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | -16.51% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -26.18% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.99% | -33.64% | -15.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.66% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -4.67% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.09% | +0.45% |
Volatility
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) have volatilities of 4.04% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USSC.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.87% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 9.89% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 12.56% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 15.58% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 15.85% | +6.97% |
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
USSC.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USSC.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USSC.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.
USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for USSC.L and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer