PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. 3USL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.15% return. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L has underperformed 3USL.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while 3USL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 28.84% annualized return.


USSC.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.58%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
12.01%

3USL.L

1D
-1.80%
1M
12.47%
YTD
25.15%
6M
26.35%
1Y
79.45%
3Y*
50.92%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
28.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
12.93%14.73%8.33%23.17%-10.14%35.22%8.76%23.19%-15.30%9.79%
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
25.15%28.97%64.00%70.49%-57.35%101.77%7.89%97.98%-27.34%69.34%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and 3USL.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.76

The correlation between USSC.L and 3USL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSC.L
3USL.L

Financial Services

19.8%
12.6%

Industrials

14.7%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
10.7%

Energy

11.2%
2.8%

Technology

9.4%
36.9%

Healthcare

7.5%
9.0%

Real Estate

6.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
10.4%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Financial Services

USSC.L
19.8%
3USL.L
12.6%

Industrials

USSC.L
14.7%
3USL.L
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

USSC.L
14.0%
3USL.L
10.7%

Energy

USSC.L
11.2%
3USL.L
2.8%

Technology

USSC.L
9.4%
3USL.L
36.9%

Healthcare

USSC.L
7.5%
3USL.L
9.0%

Real Estate

USSC.L
6.2%
3USL.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

USSC.L
6.1%
3USL.L
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

USSC.L
6.0%
3USL.L
4.7%

Communication Services

USSC.L
2.7%
3USL.L
10.4%

Utilities

USSC.L
2.5%
3USL.L
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.L3USL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.12

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

12.55

+1.55

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and 3USL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.L3USL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.30

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.47

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.60

-0.14

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and 3USL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.L3USL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-76.72%

+27.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-25.29%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-48.69%

+21.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-63.47%

+36.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

-76.72%

+27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.80%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-15.26%

+7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

6.31%

-3.77%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) is 4.04%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that USSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.L3USL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

9.44%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

25.27%

-15.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

34.49%

-18.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

47.39%

-25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

48.51%

-25.69%

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSC.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and 3USL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer