PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSBX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSBX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Short Term Bond Fund (USSBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, USSBX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 3.04%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.


USSBX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
3.04%
ALL TIME*
3.75%

BND

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.02%
YTD
0.13%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
1.44%
ALL TIME*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$518.24M$512.19M$593.29M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USSBX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSBX
USAA Short Term Bond Fund
1.27%5.79%6.21%5.99%-2.95%1.08%4.75%5.00%1.24%2.30%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.13%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between USSBX and BND is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.58

The correlation between USSBX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSBX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USSBX
USSBX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
USSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
USSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USSBX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Short Term Bond Fund (USSBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USSBXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.11

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

0.87

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

2.15

+10.16

USSBX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSBX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USSBX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSBX drawdown since its inception was -6.87%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSBX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSBXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-18.58%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

-2.68%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-4.81%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.11%

-17.81%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.57%

-18.58%

+13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-2.50%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-3.06%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

1.08%

-0.81%

Volatility

USSBX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Short Term Bond Fund (USSBX) is 0.39%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that USSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSBXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

1.04%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.34%

2.93%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

3.63%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.00%

6.03%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

5.53%

-3.74%

USSBX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSBX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSBX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

USSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.03%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
USSBX
USAA Short Term Bond Fund
4.17%4.51%4.32%3.37%2.38%2.72%3.41%2.79%2.44%1.94%1.86%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSBX and BND have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to USSBX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSBX dropped -6.87% vs BND's -18.58%.

USSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSBX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer