PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USRT vs. RSPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USRT vs. RSPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USRT achieves a 12.59% return, which is significantly higher than RSPR's 7.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USRT having a 6.21% annualized return and RSPR not far ahead at 6.22%.


USRT

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
12.59%
6M
11.36%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
6.21%

RSPR

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.06%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.11%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
6.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USRT vs. RSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
12.59%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
7.75%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%-2.90%24.62%-4.11%8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between USRT and RSPR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

0.90

The correlation between USRT and RSPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

USRT vs. RSPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USRT
RSPR

Real Estate

99.4%
96.9%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

USRT
99.4%
RSPR
96.9%

Financial Services

USRT
0.1%
RSPR
0.0%

Basic Materials

USRT

-

RSPR
3.1%

Communication Services

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Consumer Cyclical

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Consumer Defensive

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Energy

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Healthcare

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Industrials

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Technology

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Utilities

USRT

-

RSPR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USRT vs. RSPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USRT vs. RSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USRTRSPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.65

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

1.44

+4.71

USRT vs. RSPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the RSPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USRT and RSPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USRTRSPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.40

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.13

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.29

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.30

-0.11

Drawdowns

USRT vs. RSPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USRT drawdown since its inception was -69.91%, which is greater than RSPR's maximum drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USRT and RSPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USRTRSPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.91%

-41.96%

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.71%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-17.78%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-33.03%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-41.96%

-2.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-4.30%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-9.40%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.94%

-1.45%

Volatility

USRT vs. RSPR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) at 3.69%. This indicates that USRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USRTRSPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.69%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

9.86%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

14.02%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

19.09%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

21.37%

-0.09%

USRT vs. RSPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USRT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

USRT vs. RSPR - Dividend Comparison

USRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, which matches RSPR's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.67%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, USRT and RSPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USRT has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to RSPR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USRT dropped -69.91% vs RSPR's -41.96%.

On 10-year performance, RSPR leads with 6.22% vs 6.21% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPR has performed better with a 6.22% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

USRT and RSPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.67%.

USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, while RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USRT and 0.40% for RSPR.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USRT and RSPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer