PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USPX vs. EQL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USPX vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USPX having a 11.39% return and EQL slightly higher at 11.79%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USPX having a 12.33% annualized return and EQL not far ahead at 12.40%.


USPX

1D
1.57%
1M
1.59%
6M
9.42%
YTD
11.39%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
12.60%

EQL

1D
0.98%
1M
1.30%
6M
7.57%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
12.40%
ALL TIME*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.24M$2.89M$2.73M
$3.21M$2.97M$3.76M

USPX vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
11.39%17.78%24.97%27.07%-18.88%19.53%9.72%26.60%-7.78%23.80%
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
11.79%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between USPX and EQL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.81

The correlation between USPX and EQL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USPX vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USPX
EQL

Technology

37.4%
10.2%

Financial Services

12.5%
9.1%

Communication Services

9.6%
8.9%

Healthcare

9.4%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.6%

Industrials

7.9%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
8.8%

Energy

3.4%
8.7%

Utilities

2.6%
9.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
8.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.0%

Technology

USPX
37.4%
EQL
10.2%

Financial Services

USPX
12.5%
EQL
9.1%

Communication Services

USPX
9.6%
EQL
8.9%

Healthcare

USPX
9.4%
EQL
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

USPX
8.8%
EQL
9.6%

Industrials

USPX
7.9%
EQL
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

USPX
4.7%
EQL
8.8%

Energy

USPX
3.4%
EQL
8.7%

Utilities

USPX
2.6%
EQL
9.4%

Real Estate

USPX
1.8%
EQL
8.7%

Basic Materials

USPX
1.7%
EQL
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USPX vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USPX vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USPXEQLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.16

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

12.39

-2.00

USPX vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPX and EQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USPX vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPX and EQL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USPXEQLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-35.65%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-6.19%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-15.07%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-19.24%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

-35.65%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-3.23%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.58%

+0.60%

Volatility

USPX vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.29%. This indicates that USPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USPXEQLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.29%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

7.09%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

9.47%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

14.52%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.49%

-0.51%

USPX vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USPX vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than EQL's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.34%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.08%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USPX and EQL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USPX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to EQL (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USPX dropped -31.21% vs EQL's -35.65%.

On 10-year performance, EQL leads with 12.40% vs 12.33% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EQL has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.08% for USPX.

USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for USPX and 0.27% for EQL.

EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USPX and EQL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer