PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USPA.L vs. SPY5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USPA.L achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.L's 8.93% return.


USPA.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.37%
6M
6.70%
YTD
6.42%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*

SPY5.L

1D
-1.25%
1M
-0.56%
6M
7.99%
YTD
8.93%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USPA.L
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.42%15.76%26.74%30.46%-22.10%32.21%16.58%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.93%17.43%25.36%26.64%-18.68%29.28%15.98%

Correlation

The correlation between USPA.L and SPY5.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.98

The correlation between USPA.L and SPY5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USPA.L
USPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
USPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USPA.LSPY5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.43

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

9.83

-3.79

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPA.L and SPY5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.78%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.L drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPA.L and SPY5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USPA.LSPY5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-33.89%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-8.18%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-18.36%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-24.37%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.79%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-3.70%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.02%

+0.78%

Volatility

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (USPA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPY5.L) at 3.07%. This indicates that USPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USPA.LSPY5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.07%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

9.32%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

12.06%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.00%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

16.20%

+0.28%

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USPA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USPA.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison

USPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.92%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.44%0.40%1.14%1.64%1.73%
USPA.L
Franklin S&P 500 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, USPA.L and SPY5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for USPA.L.

USPA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned ESG Index, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USPA.L and 0.03% for SPY5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USPA.L and SPY5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer