USOY vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. USOY is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, USOY returned 57.29% vs 95.36% for QTUM. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. USOY charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

USOY vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USOY achieves a 62.18% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 53.29% return.

USOY

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 62.18%
• 6M: 59.35%
• 1Y: 57.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 23.63%
• YTD: 53.29%
• 6M: 50.69%
• 1Y: 95.36%
• 3Y*: 52.22%
• 5Y*: 29.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USOY vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	62.18%	-7.93%	7.27%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	53.29%	36.65%	37.16%

Correlation

The correlation between USOY and QTUM is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.05

The correlation between USOY and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USOY vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USOY vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USOY	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	3.65	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	4.26	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.55	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	6.28	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	23.69	-15.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USOY vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USOY Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USOY and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USOY	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	3.65	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.08	-0.08

Drawdowns

USOY vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USOY drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOY and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	USOY	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.46%	-38.45%	+20.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.29%	-15.26%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.11%	-0.59%	-4.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-8.25%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.42%	4.04%	+3.38%

Volatility

USOY vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.76%. This indicates that USOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USOY	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.62%	9.76%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.18%	20.35%	+6.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.44%	26.26%	+4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.13%	26.56%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.13%	27.17%	-1.04%

USOY vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USOY has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

USOY vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.16%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.16%	104.32%	48.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USOY and QTUM in my portfolio?

USOY and QTUM have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USOY or QTUM?

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to QTUM (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USOY dropped -17.46% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, USOY or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 95.36% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USOY or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 95.36% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USOY or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USOY or QTUM?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between USOY and QTUM?

USOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.22% for USOY and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.