USOI vs. PIT
USOI (Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. USOI is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past year, USOI returned 46.39% vs 60.66% for PIT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USOI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
USOI vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USOI achieves a 47.45% return, which is significantly higher than PIT's 39.26% return.
USOI
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 47.45%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 46.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIT
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 39.26%
- 6M
- 40.29%
- 1Y
- 60.66%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USOI vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 47.45% | -8.78% | 6.94% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 39.26% | 21.63% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between USOI and PIT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between USOI and PIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USOI vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
USOI
PIT
USOI vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USOI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 6.58 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 22.21 | -13.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USOI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.85 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
USOI vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USOI drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOI and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USOI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -12.27% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -9.27% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -5.98% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -3.99% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 2.74% | +2.39% |
Volatility
USOI vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 6.23%. This indicates that USOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USOI | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 6.23% | +4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.34% | 19.07% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 21.37% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 17.48% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.61% | 17.48% | +5.13% |
USOI vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USOI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
USOI vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.65%, more than PIT's 6.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 6.40% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 37.65% | 27.21% | 12.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USOI and PIT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USOI has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to PIT (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USOI dropped -19.49% vs PIT's -12.27%.
On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 60.66% vs 46.39% for USOI. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 60.66% return vs 46.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.
USOI has the higher dividend yield at 37.65%, compared with 6.40% for PIT.
They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for USOI and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USOI and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer