PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USOI vs. EVMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USOI vs. EVMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USOI achieves a 47.45% return, which is significantly higher than EVMT's 12.53% return.


USOI

1D
-2.04%
1M
0.59%
YTD
47.45%
6M
44.00%
1Y
46.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVMT

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
12.53%
6M
21.65%
1Y
41.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USOI vs. EVMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USOI and EVMT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.12

The correlation between USOI and EVMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USOI vs. EVMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EVMT
EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USOI vs. EVMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USOIEVMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

5.19

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

17.50

-8.42

USOI vs. EVMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USOI Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the EVMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USOI and EVMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USOIEVMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.73

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

-0.27

+1.16

Drawdowns

USOI vs. EVMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USOI drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum EVMT drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOI and EVMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USOIEVMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-48.34%

+28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-7.96%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-22.32%

+17.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-34.72%

+27.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

2.35%

+2.78%

Volatility

USOI vs. EVMT - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) at 4.21%. This indicates that USOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USOIEVMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.37%

4.21%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.34%

13.49%

+4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

15.12%

+7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

20.51%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.61%

20.51%

+2.10%

USOI vs. EVMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USOI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EVMT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

USOI vs. EVMT - Dividend Comparison

USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.65%, more than EVMT's 10.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EVMT
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
10.49%11.80%3.62%5.49%0.86%
USOI
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN
37.65%27.21%12.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USOI and EVMT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOI has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to EVMT (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USOI dropped -19.49% vs EVMT's -48.34%.

On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 46.39% vs 41.08% for EVMT. On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EVMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 46.39% return vs 41.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 37.65%, compared with 10.49% for EVMT.

They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for USOI and 0.59% for EVMT.

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USOI and EVMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer