USOI vs. COMB
USOI (Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USOI is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. USOI is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past year, USOI returned 24.20% vs 25.18% for COMB. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USOI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
USOI vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USOI achieves a 24.69% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 14.68% return.
USOI
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -14.40%
- YTD
- 24.69%
- 6M
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- —
USOI vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 24.69% | -8.78% | 3.24% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 14.68% | 15.12% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between USOI and COMB is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between USOI and COMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USOI vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
USOI
COMB
USOI vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USOI | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.71 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 7.07 | -3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USOI vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USOI drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOI and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USOI | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -33.50% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.86% | -14.84% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.71% | -13.50% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -12.04% | +4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 3.57% | +2.53% |
Volatility
USOI vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 4.43%. This indicates that USOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USOI | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 4.43% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.82% | 15.38% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 17.27% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 16.72% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 15.15% | +8.08% |
USOI vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
USOI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
USOI vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.04%, more than COMB's 7.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.89% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 48.04% | 27.21% | 12.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USOI and COMB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USOI has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to COMB (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USOI dropped -21.86% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 25.18% vs 24.20% for USOI. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMB has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 25.18% return vs 24.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for USOI.
USOI has the higher dividend yield at 48.04%, compared with 7.89% for COMB.
USOI is categorized as Oil & Gas, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for USOI and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USOI and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer